Seducing Someone's Spouse? It May Cost You

A Mississippi millionaire must pay $750,000 to the man whose wife he stole away, after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case.

Sandra Valentine had been married to plumber Johnny Valentine for four years when she began working for Holly Springs, Miss., businessman Jerry Fitch Sr.

Within a year, Sandra and Fitch, who was also married, began an affair. When Sandra got pregnant, Johnny, who suspected she was cheating, ordered a paternity test, which showed he was not the father.

Johnny filed for divorce and then sued Fitch, claiming “alienation of affection,” or, in other words, stealing his wife’s love.

Johnny won more than $750,000 in state court, and the verdict was upheld by the state Supreme Court. Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case, ending Fitch’s appeal.

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Culture-Watch, Law & Legal Issues, Marriage & Family

15 comments on “Seducing Someone's Spouse? It May Cost You

  1. azusa says:

    I hope Mrs Fitch gets the rest.

  2. AnglicanFirst says:

    Good!

    And Gordian, I agree with your comment.

  3. Br_er Rabbit says:

    Mississippi is somewhat behind the rest of the nation in their domestic relationship law here. Few states still hold that a wife’s “affection” is the lega property of the husband, such that it can be “stolen” from him by another.

  4. Br_er Rabbit says:

    lega[l]

  5. Jody+ says:

    #3, I know in NC, the alienation of affection law cuts both ways. It’s too bad it’s going out of style–it might help people to know they could get bit by their misbehavior.

  6. Jim the Puritan says:

    [3] B. Rabbit–We lawyers are never dissuaded. We would probably just come up with a new theory, like “tortious interference with a contractual relationship.” 🙂

  7. Charley says:

    $750K plus eternity in Hell for committing adultery.

  8. Denbeau says:

    uh, Charley, not that I’m trying to defend the behaviour – there is no defense – but didn’t Somebody say something about sins being forgiven?

  9. RoyIII says:

    A complete defense is that there were no affections to alienate.

  10. The young fogey says:

    Sounds like good old-fashioned justice: indeed a reminder that your misbehaviour will bite you. I understand that alienation-of-affections laws apply to both sexes or at least as in NC they ought to.

    [url=http://aconservativesiteforpeace.info]Blog.[/url]

  11. NewTrollObserver says:

    Uh, shouldn’t the wife being paying some dough? She has a free mind, right? Even in Mississippi, right?

  12. NewTrollObserver says:

    being = be

  13. indie says:

    Wow. This treats women like chattel. She walked away of her own free will.

  14. wondering says:

    #10, please elaborate. I believe their were 7 states (nc included) with this law.

  15. evan miller says:

    Glad to hear the adulterers will have to fork over major bucks.